Sponsored programs offices support many investigators against many notices at once. SoliContraX keeps each proposal tied to its own notice and its own materials, and checks every section against what that sponsor asked for.
Upload the NOFO, RFA, or program announcement from the sponsor. Eligibility, review criteria, required documents, and page limits are extracted and used to check the draft.
Biosketches, facilities descriptions, prior proposals, data management plans, and departmental boilerplate live in a knowledge base per PI or center and are reused across submissions.
The workflow proposes the concept from the notice and the materials. The PI adjusts it in chat and approves it, which keeps late rewrites rare.
Budget narratives are framed by 2 CFR 200 allowability and SF-424A object classes when the sponsor requires them.
Federal NOFOs and RFAs, or any sponsor guidelines you can upload.
Refine and approve the approach in chat before drafting begins.
Sections are written from the knowledge base and the notice, with gaps marked rather than filled.
The responsiveness check and quality report feed your internal review; export to Word or PDF for the submission system.
No. It produces the narrative, the budget narrative, the check, and the exports. Submission stays in your existing systems.
Yes. Each client in the workspace has its own knowledge base; use one per investigator, lab, or center.
Only what you provide: the funding notice, the files in that client’s knowledge base, and the concept you approved. If a fact is not in your context, it is not in the draft.
You. The workspace is private to one account, your content is never used to train public models, and we do not sell your data. The Security page has the full commitments.
The next RFA in the queue, drafted and checked.